In my understanding, the OP takes advantage of the phrase URL in the best sense. I do think this reply is much more misleading, mainly because it doesnt Plainly would make the distinction between the hostname while in the URL plus the hostname from the DNS resolution.
This could improve in future with encrypted SNI and DNS but as of 2018 both of those technologies will not be normally in use.
Motion picture of House tourists landing on a planet where by people today Dwell inside a mountain or underground and take in mushrooms as their staple
For instance, you can use port 30443 for SSL VPN if your VPN gateway supports port reassignment plus the SSL VPN client (if any) does this at the same time. In case you obtain SSL VPN through Net portal, you can include the personalized port quantity from the URL such as this: "".
You'll be able to not constantly depend on privateness of the entire URL either. For example, as is sometimes the case on business networks, provided units like your organization Computer are configured with an extra "trustworthy" root certificate so that the browser can quietly believe in a proxy (person-in-the-middle) inspection of https visitors. Because of this the entire URL is exposed for inspection. This is frequently saved into a log.
Want to +1 this, but I find the "Indeed and no" deceptive - you ought to improve that to only indicate that the server identify will probably be resolved employing DNS without encryption.
The domain, which is Component of the URL the user is checking out, just isn't a hundred% encrypted due to the fact I because the attacker can sniff which web page he is traveling to. Just the /route of the URL is inherently encrypted for the layman (it doesn't make any difference how).
If both web sites are on TLS, the ask for to website B will consist of the full URL from web site A inside the referer parameter of the request. And admin from web page B can retrieve it through the log documents of server B.)
As the other answers have now pointed out, https "URLs" are in truth encrypted. Nonetheless, your DNS ask for/response when resolving the area name is most likely not, and of course, when you were being employing a browser, your URLs is likely to be recorded much too.
That may actually only be possible on incredibly compact web sites, As well as in Those people circumstances, the topic/tone/nature of the positioning would most likely even now be with regard to the exact on Every web page.
@EJP although the DNS lookup does use precisely what is at a single https://jdmengineforsale.com/product/jdm-mitsubishi-turbo-4g63t-engine-for-sale/ level Element of the URL, so for the non-technological human being, the complete URL is not really encrypted. The non-technological individual who's just using Google.com to lookup non-complex matters isn't going to know exactly where the information eventually resides or how it is dealt with.
@EJP, the domain is obvious on account of SNI which all modern Net browsers use. Also see this diagram through the EFF displaying that any individual can see the area of the site you are going to. This isn't about browser visibility. It really is about what exactly is obvious to eavesdroppers.
Having said that There are a selection of explanation why you should not put parameters while in the GET ask for. Initially, as currently outlined by Many others: - leakage by browser deal with bar
If this is the scenario I'd propose oAuth2 login to get a bearer token. Where circumstance the sole sensitive info might be the Original credentials...which ought to almost certainly be inside a put up request in any case